Jump to content

Most Liked Content

#13506 LL "Sportsmanship" Story

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 14 June 2017 - 02:43 PM

12 year old with down syndrome gets his wish!

  • Jeremy, amutz, rsnyder6 and 1 other like this

#9723 Forcing L/A 11 to majors.

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 25 April 2016 - 12:39 PM

If RB56 is correct that the Central Region and Williamsport have been contacted on several of these issues by e:mail and by phone and nothing was done then I am very disappointed in LL.
It sets a bad precedent and it's not fair to the thousands of leagues out there that bust their butts to do things the right way.

More importantly, it's not fair to the 20% of the 12 year olds in the league that are playing in minors instead of majors.
  • amutz, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this

#9701 Forcing L/A 11 to majors.

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 22 April 2016 - 10:33 PM

Ok, so I'll amend my previous statement, your BOD, your DA, the Central Region Director and the people on the Charter Committee should be fired!!!

This goes against the age old adage that all 12s should play in majors.
Age 12 is their last chance to play majors, why take it away from them?

Of course, maybe that's just me (but I sure hope not).
  • Jeremy, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this

#9523 Possibilities of New Teenage Rollout

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 11 April 2016 - 01:23 PM

As of today, LL stops at age 18.
So, I would hope they would go with something like this:
Intermediate (50/70): 11-13
Juniors: 13-15
Seniors: 16-18

If LL approves expanding to 19 year olds, make Seniors 16-19.
  • amutz, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this

#9311 2016 World Series Umps

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 21 March 2016 - 01:34 PM

CONGRATS to all of the Umpires appointed to the various 2016 World Series (announcement/list is linked below).

In addition, a BIG THANK YOU to every Volunteer Little League Umpire.



  • amutz, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this

#9024 Free Tee-Ball Shirts !

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 16 February 2016 - 07:00 PM

Thank you to the Tampa Bay Rays !!!

Just talked to my old DA, he's delivering Tee-Ball Shirts this week (just in time for Opening Day this coming Saturday).

All of the leagues in my old District in Florida were given Free Shirts for all of their Tee-Ball Teams.

The Rays donated about 10,000 shirts to Tee-Ball Teams from LL, CR, Dixie and PONY.

They also held a free Tee-Ball Coach Clinic last Saturday.


They also have a "Day at the Rays" for our District (and other Districts) where any player and his/her family get significantly reduced price tickets for a Saturday afternoon game (usually in late May/early June).

The last year I was there (I think it was 2012) there were several thousand people from our District in attendance.


Again, a big Thank You to the Rays.

  • amutz, 2DirtyKids and rsnyder6 like this

#8201 Special Games or Rule Violation?

Posted by B_Hanlon on 24 November 2015 - 03:50 PM

Everyone involved in Little League knows that they have been trying to become as flexible as possible the past few years to compete with travel ball. We have seen dramatic changes on the softball side to specifically target ASA with double headers, tournaments and pitching rule changes. It only makes sense that Little League targets travel ball to grab that piece of the pie. The dilemma is that they still want to hold the "concept" of tournament teams being sacred (even though they know half of them double as travel teams) and they also want to remain sacred being all inclusive in not allowing leagues to just cherry pick the best kids to play on their "house travel teams" but we all know it is happening.


Personally, I would love to see Little League offer more options for the die hard baseball loving kids to play at a more competitive level on weekends while still playing house during the week. I have a fundamental problem that competitive baseball is only for those that can afford it.

  • amutz, Lou Barbieri and Plesh like this

#8150 Proposed Age Change (The second guessing begins......)

Posted by Mike_Hirschman on 22 November 2015 - 02:29 PM

If you don't understand the comparison, then you don't understand being an administrator. You said no one cared and just dismissed it. Administrators who are in the program for ALL of the kids, not just their own, care about ALL of the rule changes.


I haven't been around a Big League Baseball game in over a decade and can count on two hands how many in my 30 years. But guess what? I ask enough questions and care enough about the program to have a somewhat informed opinion on a current proposed rule change that would allow 19-year-olds to play Big League baseball. Because who knows when my district might wind up with a charter in the program.


The issues of on-deck, head-first, pitch count have been widely criticized for a number of years by parents wanting "real baseball". So yes, by constant adult criticism and some even saying they won't play Little League because of it, there are correlations and comparisons. And yes, those are constantly on the board as "hot topics" even more than a decade after the on-deck circle was removed... which occurred because the third adult coach that had finally been written into the rules didn't pay enough attention and it was costing $500 every time a kid lost a tooth.


If 7-year-olds want to play in a special games event, that's up to a local league to decide. It wouldn't ever get my board vote. But to call them all-stars or make it into a select atmosphere is absurd in my opinion... and it continues to contribute to those wanting to run off and start their own travel teams.

  • DCBaseball, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this

#7763 Little League Team Expansion

Posted by Dave Poe on 24 September 2015 - 03:43 AM

You keep harping about where LL is.
Call them and ask them. Email them.
It's that simple and they do answer.
Present to someone either in your Regional Office or in Williamsport what the issues are.
Lay it out for them.

A key piece of advice is to leave out anything that personally applies to you and/or any personal opinions.
Stick to the facts that are in the public domain.
They can't act on what they don't know about.

Going on a forum an complaining isn't going to get you or your league anywhere.

Another piece of advice - don't take anyone's word that the higher ups have approved anything unless you see it in writing.
I once had a manager try to appeal to the automatic one game suspension for an ejection. He called WP and the person told him he could appeal. I was confused since I knew he couldn't. When I spoke to the person at WP, I found out that this manager told him a completed different story of what happened. The WP person thought he was being asked about appealing an additional penalty issued by the BOD when that wasn't the case at all.

Call or email your region. Call or email someone in WP. They aren't in hiding....
  • amutz, Lou Barbieri and Plesh like this


Posted by Plesh on 17 April 2018 - 12:51 PM

I think there's a few reasons it's seen less in LL:


1. Less check swings in general

2. Often there is only one umpire

3. If there are two umpires, they are usually kids

4. Manager/ coach don't know you can appeal

5. And the most obvious answer, because they just don't care. Unless it's an All Star game, I'm not asking for an appeal.

  • Robin Barradio, amutz and rsnyder6 like this

#14653 Blind Draft

Posted by Mr. Dill on 06 April 2018 - 11:42 AM

I have a league that has 6 teams in majors and each manager picks each team as evenly as possible.
Then they draw a number out of the hat and they get that team plus their child.
LL says thats looks like a blind draft.
I asked for an approval and LL gave it to that league.
This is truly the fairest way to have each team as even as possible.
  • amutz, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this

#14059 NE manager willingly was to forego MPR?

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 15 August 2017 - 05:01 PM

Ok, so don't make it a guideline, make it a rule.

10-12 Baseball Tournament Affidavits must have a minimum of twelve players.
Exception: A DA may approve a 10-12 Baseball Tournament Affidavit with less than twelve players if the league, or combination of leagues, has less than four major teams.
  • Jeremy, amutz and rsnyder6 like this

#13928 A Bit Of Controversy From The Dakota's

Posted by richives on 01 August 2017 - 02:38 PM

So just implement a rule that newly formed leagues must have been chartered with LL for the two prior seasons before you may enter the tournament.  Leagues that have existed intact under a different umbrella or at least two years before chartering with LL may enter immediaely.

  • amutz, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this

#12915 Intermediate division, continuous batting order

Posted by coach andy on 18 April 2017 - 07:37 PM

we do the 9 defensive outs / 3 innings as well for MPR, but we do not insist they are consecutive.


speaking from parents side, that end of the order batter can create some special memories.  my stepson really struggled all year at 9 or 10 in minors, had some contact, but not a clean hit all year .  tie game, bottom of last inning in "championship" game, he is up, runner on 1st, 2 outs.  I am at outfield fence near concessions getting something for mom, and i am just praying he does not make 3rd out.  one an early pitch, runner moves to 2B, no attempt made to throw.  they are counting on getting the batter, my stepson.  he sends one up the middle for base hit, runner scores.  coach makes certain to get the ball, and a week or so later gives it to stepson with date, score, and game winning RBI on it. Ball still is in our house (stepson is getting ready for college in the fall), and that hit is still remembered.  

  • Jeremy, amutz and rsnyder6 like this

#12159 LL format - ratio of full redraft to retention + waivers question

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 08 December 2016 - 01:28 PM

Plan A (player retention) is for a normal draft, it is NOT an approved Plan for either Expansion or Reduction.

I guess you could ask for a Waiver to use Plan A to Expand or Reduce the number of teams but you would need to describe exactly how you would do it.

Who knows, LL might approve it!


So, absent a Waiver, you need to use one of the Expansion Plans in 2017 and 2018 and then one of the Team Reduction Plans in 2019.

That said, I do know of leagues that Re-Draft every year that have gotten permission (Waiver) to use Plan B/Alternate Plan B to Expand and/or Reduce the number of teams based on the number of players that year.

In my opinion, they should list Plan B, Alternate Plan B and Plan C as "acceptable" Plans for Expansion/Reduction.



As for Re-Drafting, to my knowledge, 12 of the 14 leagues in my District Re-Draft every year using Plan B or Alternate Plan B - I prefer Alternate Plan B.



As for 12s in Minors, 2% doesn't sound too bad (safety reasons) but 10% sounds way too high (at least it does to me).

I go back to my years with PONY, if PONY can have ALL 11s and 12s play together why do so many Little Leagues have a problem doing it?

Yes, there are some "safety issues" which is why I personally have no problem Waiving "a few" 12s to minors but in my opinion there should only be a few, no where near 10%.

I asked my DA and he said that last year he approved 19 Waivers for 12s to play in minors, that's 19 Waivers for 14 leagues. 

  • rsnyder6, Plesh and ep_143 like this

#11420 Pros & Cons Of Draft Plan A

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 18 August 2016 - 09:36 PM

What problems have you had with Plan B that makes you want to go to Plan A?

In the past few years the movement has been going away from Plan A to Plan B, I prefer Alternate Plan B.

The decision is up to your BOD and they can use different Plans for different Divisions.

In my experience, Plan A often results in team imbalance.
Plan B has a better chance to end up with better team balance.

  • Jeremy, amutz and Plesh like this

#11338 Path to State Tournament Questions

Posted by stan.staziak on 13 August 2016 - 12:08 AM


HPU to catcher before the game, "what's your job?"
Catcher to HPU before the game, "I'm the catcher!"
HPU to catcher: "No. Your job is to protect me from the ball. Do that and we'll get along!"

my son is a catcher at the 15U/JV level and he knows to answer that question right.

according to him it usually works this way; the ump introduces himself and then my son will say my name is ****** and then he says "and I'm here to make sure you don't get hit"

A couple of times the umps laughed and said, is your dad an ump?
  • Jeremy, amutz and Plesh like this

#10751 9/10 Tournament, 2nd team, 13 players on roster

Posted by Lou Barbieri on 02 July 2016 - 01:40 AM

I'm in favor of as many kids playing All Stars as possible but I don't like A/B teams, especially if most of the better pitchers are on the "A" team.
If you don't have pitching on the "B" team you are in big trouble.
Without decent pitching you're setting up your "B" team to fail and it's likely they'll get beat badly.
Not normally a good experience for those players.

In my opinion, if you are going to have two teams, split the talent as even as possible between them.
  • rsnyder6, Plesh and baseballcll like this

#10748 9/10 Tournament, 2nd team, 13 players on roster

Posted by Mike_Hirschman on 01 July 2016 - 08:50 PM

How about not having two tournament teams?


That's what special games events are for if you are going to create them as an A/B rather than equally distribute the pool. I am all for giving kids an opportunity for compete. But don't stack the deck by making an A/B

  • DCBaseball, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this

#10734 all star selection recourse

Posted by richives on 30 June 2016 - 08:02 PM

All selection methods are wrong.

  • Jeremy, rsnyder6 and Plesh like this