- Jeremy, amutz, rsnyder6 and 1 other like this
Jump to content
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 25 April 2016 - 12:39 PM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 22 April 2016 - 10:33 PM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 11 April 2016 - 01:23 PM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 21 March 2016 - 01:34 PM
CONGRATS to all of the Umpires appointed to the various 2016 World Series (announcement/list is linked below).
In addition, a BIG THANK YOU to every Volunteer Little League Umpire.
Posted by B_Hanlon on 24 November 2015 - 03:50 PM
Everyone involved in Little League knows that they have been trying to become as flexible as possible the past few years to compete with travel ball. We have seen dramatic changes on the softball side to specifically target ASA with double headers, tournaments and pitching rule changes. It only makes sense that Little League targets travel ball to grab that piece of the pie. The dilemma is that they still want to hold the "concept" of tournament teams being sacred (even though they know half of them double as travel teams) and they also want to remain sacred being all inclusive in not allowing leagues to just cherry pick the best kids to play on their "house travel teams" but we all know it is happening.
Personally, I would love to see Little League offer more options for the die hard baseball loving kids to play at a more competitive level on weekends while still playing house during the week. I have a fundamental problem that competitive baseball is only for those that can afford it.
Posted by Mike_Hirschman on 22 November 2015 - 02:29 PM
If you don't understand the comparison, then you don't understand being an administrator. You said no one cared and just dismissed it. Administrators who are in the program for ALL of the kids, not just their own, care about ALL of the rule changes.
I haven't been around a Big League Baseball game in over a decade and can count on two hands how many in my 30 years. But guess what? I ask enough questions and care enough about the program to have a somewhat informed opinion on a current proposed rule change that would allow 19-year-olds to play Big League baseball. Because who knows when my district might wind up with a charter in the program.
The issues of on-deck, head-first, pitch count have been widely criticized for a number of years by parents wanting "real baseball". So yes, by constant adult criticism and some even saying they won't play Little League because of it, there are correlations and comparisons. And yes, those are constantly on the board as "hot topics" even more than a decade after the on-deck circle was removed... which occurred because the third adult coach that had finally been written into the rules didn't pay enough attention and it was costing $500 every time a kid lost a tooth.
If 7-year-olds want to play in a special games event, that's up to a local league to decide. It wouldn't ever get my board vote. But to call them all-stars or make it into a select atmosphere is absurd in my opinion... and it continues to contribute to those wanting to run off and start their own travel teams.
Posted by Dave Poe on 24 September 2015 - 03:43 AM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 27 November 2014 - 07:18 PM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 12 June 2018 - 08:07 PM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 15 May 2018 - 08:22 PM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 05 May 2018 - 01:18 PM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 22 April 2018 - 11:05 PM
BTW, I’m new to this forum and love it!
I’ve learned a lot.
Posted by Mr. Dill on 06 April 2018 - 11:42 AM
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 15 August 2017 - 05:01 PM
Posted by richives on 01 August 2017 - 02:38 PM
So just implement a rule that newly formed leagues must have been chartered with LL for the two prior seasons before you may enter the tournament. Leagues that have existed intact under a different umbrella or at least two years before chartering with LL may enter immediaely.
Posted by coach andy on 18 April 2017 - 07:37 PM
we do the 9 defensive outs / 3 innings as well for MPR, but we do not insist they are consecutive.
speaking from parents side, that end of the order batter can create some special memories. my stepson really struggled all year at 9 or 10 in minors, had some contact, but not a clean hit all year . tie game, bottom of last inning in "championship" game, he is up, runner on 1st, 2 outs. I am at outfield fence near concessions getting something for mom, and i am just praying he does not make 3rd out. one an early pitch, runner moves to 2B, no attempt made to throw. they are counting on getting the batter, my stepson. he sends one up the middle for base hit, runner scores. coach makes certain to get the ball, and a week or so later gives it to stepson with date, score, and game winning RBI on it. Ball still is in our house (stepson is getting ready for college in the fall), and that hit is still remembered.
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 15 August 2016 - 03:03 PM
Yes, BUT !!!
If I were the opposing manager I would ask the ump Why he awarded second.
If he said "In my judgment the runner would have made it to second if he wasn't obstructed", we're done, runner gets second.
BUT, if he said "It was obstruction and the runner automatically gets second" then, my response is "I Protest" !!!
At that point it's a mis-application of a rule, not an umpire judgment call.
Posted by stan.staziak on 13 August 2016 - 12:08 AM
my son is a catcher at the 15U/JV level and he knows to answer that question right.
HPU to catcher before the game, "what's your job?"
Catcher to HPU before the game, "I'm the catcher!"
HPU to catcher: "No. Your job is to protect me from the ball. Do that and we'll get along!"
Posted by Lou Barbieri on 02 July 2016 - 01:40 AM